The Baby Scoop Era was a period in United States history starting after the end of World War II Albania · Australia · Austria · Azerbaijan · Belarus · Belgium · Brazil · Bulgaria · Burma · Cambodia · Canada · Ceylon (Sri Lanka) · Channel Islands · China · Czechoslovakia · Denmark · Dutch East Indies · Egypt · Estonia · Finland · France · Germany · Gibraltar · Greece · Greenland · Hong Kong · Hungary · Iceland · and ending in 1972,[1] characterized by an increased rate of pre-marital pregnancies over the preceding period, along with a higher rate of newborn adoption. From approximately 1940 to 1970, it is estimated that up to 4 million mothers in the United States ^ b. English is the de facto language of American government and the sole language spoken at home by 80% of Americans age five and older. Spanish is the second most commonly spoken language surrendered newborn babies to adoption Adoption is a process whereby a person assumes the parenting for another who is not kin and, in so doing, permanently transfers all rights and responsibilities from the original parent or parents. Unlike guardianship or other systems designed for the care of the young, adoption is intended to effect a permanent change in status and as such; 2 million during the 1960s alone. Annual numbers for non-relative adoptions increased from an estimated 33,800 in 1951 to a peak of 89,200 in 1970, then quickly declined to an estimated 47,700 in 1975.[2][3] (This does not include the number of infants adopted and raised by relatives.[4]) In contrast, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that only 14,000 infants were "voluntarily" surrendered in 2003.[5]
This period of history has been documented in scholarly books such as Wake Up Little Susie and Beggars and Choosers, both by historian Rickie Sollinger, and social histories such as The Girls Who Went Away by Ann Fessler, a professor of photography at the Rhode Island School of Design The Rhode Island School of Design is a fine arts and design college located in Providence, Rhode Island. It was founded in 1877 and is located at the base of College Hill and contiguous with the Brown University campus. The two institutions share social, academic, and community resources and offer joint courses. Applicants are required to complete who exhibited an art installation by the same title. It is also the theme of the documentary Gone To A Good Home by Film Australia Film Australia was a company established by the Government of Australia to produce films about Australia. Its mission was to create an audio-visual record of Australian life, through the commissioning, distribution and management of programs that deal with matters of national interest or illustrate and interpret aspects of Australian life.
Beginning in the 1940s and 1950s, illegitimacy At common law, legitimacy is the status of a child who is born to parents who are legally married to one another, or who is born shortly after the parents' marriage ends through divorce. The opposite of legitimacy is the status of being illegitimate – born to a woman and a man who are not married to one another began to be defined in terms of psychological deficits on the part of the mother.[6] At the same time, a liberalization of sexual mores combined with restrictions on access to birth control led to an increase in premarital pregnancies.[7] The dominant psychological and social work view was that the large majority of unmarried mothers were better off being separated by adoption Adoption is a process whereby a person assumes the parenting for another who is not kin and, in so doing, permanently transfers all rights and responsibilities from the original parent or parents. Unlike guardianship or other systems designed for the care of the young, adoption is intended to effect a permanent change in status and as such from their newborn The term infant derives from the Latin word infans, meaning "unable to speak or speechless." It is typically applied to children between the ages of 1 month and 12 months; however, definitions vary between birth and 3 years of age babies.[8] According to Mandell (2007), "In most cases, adoption was presented to the mothers as the only option and little or no effort was made to help the mothers keep and raise the children."[9]
Solinger (2000) defines the change that occurred during this period that differentiated it from preceding times:
"Black single mothers were expected to keep their babies as most unwed mothers, black and white, had done throughout American history. Unmarried white mothers, for the first time in American history, were expected to put their babies up for adoption." [10]
Solinger also describes the social pressures that led to this unusual trend:
"For white girls and women illegitimately pregnant in the pre-Roe era, the main chance for attaining home and marriage... rested on the aspect of their rehabilitation that required relinquishment... More than 80 percent of white unwed mothers in maternity homes came to this decision... acting in effect as breeders for white, adoptive parents, for whom they supplied up to nearly 90 percent of all nonrelative infants by the mid-1960s... Unwed mothers were defined by psychological theory as not-mothers... As long as these females had no control over their reproductive lives, they were subject to the will and the ideology of those who watched over them. And the will, veiled though it often was, called for unwed mothers to acknowledge their shame and guilt, repent, and rededicate themselves." [11]
According to Ellison:
From 1960-70, 27 percent of all births to married women between the ages of 15 and 29 were conceived premaritally. Yet the etiology of single, white, middle-class women's conceptions had shifted again and were now perceived as symptoms of female neurosis ... the majority (85-95 percent) of single, white, middle-class women, who either could not or would not procure an illegal or therapeutic abortion, were encouraged, and at times coerced, to adopt-away their child (Edwards, 1993; McAdoo, 1992; Pannor et al., 1979; Solinger, 1992, 1993).[12]
In popular usage, Singer Celeste Billhartz uses the term on her website to refer to the era covered by her work "The Mothers Project." A letter on Senator Bill Finch's website uses the term as well. Writer Betty Mandell references the term in her article "Adoption". The term was also used in a 2004 edition of the Richmond Times-Dispatch:
"She and many others opposed to adoption gave birth to children who were later adopted in what some call the "baby scoop era" - a period generally after World War II and before Roe versus Wade in 1973 - when unmarried mothers were shunned by society and maternity homes were in vogue ..."[13]
Contents |
Similar social developments in other countries
The Baby Scoop Era was not limited to the United States ^ b. English is the de facto language of American government and the sole language spoken at home by 80% of Americans age five and older. Spanish is the second most commonly spoken language. A similar social development took place simultaneously in the United Kingdom The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland[note 7] is a sovereign state located off the northwestern coast of continental Europe. It is an island country, spanning an archipelago including Great Britain, the northeastern part of the island of Ireland, and many small islands. Northern Ireland is the only part of the UK with a land,[14] New Zealand New Zealand is an island country in the south-western Pacific Ocean comprising two main landmasses , and numerous smaller islands, most notably Stewart Island/Rakiura and the Chatham Islands. The indigenous Māori language name for New Zealand is Aotearoa, commonly translated as The Land of the Long White Cloud. The Realm of New Zealand also,[15] Australia,[16] and Canada The land occupied by Canada was inhabited for millennia by various groups of Aboriginal peoples. Beginning in the late 15th century, British and French expeditions explored, and later settled, along the Atlantic coast. France ceded nearly all of its colonies in North America in 1763 after the Seven Years' War. In 1867, with the union of three.[17]
The Baby Scoop Era in Canada (Caucasian babies from born from Caucasian mothers) occurred until abortion was legalized in 1988 after the infamous case against Dr. Henry Morgentaler. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._v._Morgentaler R. v. Morgentaler 1 S.C.R. 30 was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada wherein the abortion provision in the Criminal Code of Canada was found to be unconstitutional, as it violated a woman's right under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to "security of person". Ever since this ruling, there have been no laws
The BSE in Canada lasted over 15 years longer than in the US.
The term Baby Scoop Era is similar to the term Sixties Scoop, which was coined by Patrick Johnston, author of Native Children and the Child Welfare System.[18] "Sixties Scoop" refers to the Canadian practice, beginning in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, of apprehending unusually high numbers of Native children from their families and fostering or adopting them out, usually into white families.[19] A similar event happened in Australia where Aboriginal children, sometimes referred to as the Stolen Generation The Stolen Generations is a term used to describe those children of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent who were removed from their families by the Australian Federal and State government agencies and church missions, under acts of their respective parliaments. The removals occurred in the period between approximately 1869 and, were removed from their families and placed into internment camps, orphanages and other institutions.
End of the Baby Scoop Era
Infant adoptions began declining in the early 1970s, a decline often attributed to the court case Roe v. Wade Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion is determined by the stage of pregnancy, and the state cannot prohibit abortion before viability. After viability, the state cannot prohibit abortion if "it is necessary, in, but which also partially resulted from social changes that enabled white middle-class mothers to choose single motherhood. Brozinsky (1994) speaks of the decline in newborn adoptions as reflecting a freedom of choice embraced by youth and the women's movement of the 1960s-1970s, resulting in an increase in the number of unmarried mothers who kept their babies as opposed to surrendering them. "In 1970, approximately 80% of the infants born to single mothers were placed for adoption, whereas by 1983 that figure had dropped to only 4%."[20]
In contrast to numbers in the 1960s and 1970s, from 1989 to 1995 less than 1% of children born to never-married women were surrendered for adoption.[21]
Australian decline
It is generally understood that the decline in adoptions in Australia during the 1970s was linked to a 1973 law providing for financial assistance to single parents:
"As it is still historically understood that the sole parent's benefit did not come into existence until July 1973 and was understood to be a major factor in the decline of adoptable babies, we feel quite comfortable in our assertion that at least until 1973 no alternatives to adoption were being offered. Post-1973 those alternatives were still being hidden from many uninformed young women, but we are unable to ascertain how many mothers who lost their babies had actually been given this information during the 1970s"[22]
References
| Constructs such as ibid. Ibid. is the term used to provide an endnote or footnote citation or reference for a source that was cited in the preceding endnote or footnote. It is similar in meaning to idem (meaning something that has been mentioned previously; the same) abbreviated Id., which is commonly used in legal citation and loc. cit. Loc. cit. is a footnote or endnote term used to repeat the title and page number for a given author. Loc. cit. is used in place of ibid. when the reference is not only to the work immediately preceding, but also refers to the same page. Loc. cit. is also used instead of op. cit. when reference is made to a work previously cited and to the same are discouraged by Wikipedia's style guide for footnotes as they are easily broken. Please improve this article by replacing them with named references (), or an abbreviated title. |
- ^ The Baby Scoop Era Research Initiative
- ^ Pelton, L. (1988). "The Institution of Adoption: Its Sources and Perpetuation" in Infertility and Adoption, A Guide for Social Work Practice, Deborah Valentine, Editor. (pp. 88-89)
- ^ Maza, P.L. (1984). Adoption trends: 1944-1975. Child Welfare Research Notes #9. Washington, DC: Administration for Children, Youth, and Families, 1984.
- ^ ibid
- ^ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway (2005). Voluntary Relinquishment for Adoption: Numbers and Trends
- ^ Solinger, R. (2000). Wake Up Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race Before Roe v. Wade. (p. 88)
- ^ Petrie, A. (1998). Gone to an Aunt's: Remembering Canada's Homes for Unwed Mothers. (pp. 7-8)
- ^ O'Shaughnassy, T. (1994). Adoption, Social Work Social work is a profession that strives to address social problems. Social workers draw on the social and behavioural sciences to meet the needs of clients. For example, social workers may provide psychotherapy to individuals and families, produce assessments of child welfare for government and law enforcement, and work with clients in prisons, and Social Theory (p. 115)
- ^ Mandell, B. (2007). "Adoption. " New Politics, Vol. 11, No. 2, Winter 2007, Whole No. 42
- ^ Solinger, R. (2000). Wake Up Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race Before Roe v. Wade. (p. 149)
- ^ Solinger, R. (2000). Wake Up Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race Before Roe v. Wade. (p. 95)
- ^ Ellison, M. (2003). "Authoritative Knowledge and Single Women's Unintentional Pregnancies, Abortions, Adoption and Single Motherhood: Social Stigma and Structural Violence," in Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Vol 17(3), 2003, page 326.
- ^ Lohmann, B. "World of Adoption; Forced to Give Up Her Baby, She Now Opposes Adoption," Richmond Times-Dispatch, November 21, 2004, p. G-1.
- ^ Trackers International, "Survey 1000"
- ^ Shawyer, J. (1979). Death by Adoption
- ^ Moor, M. (2007). Silent Violence: Australia's White Stolen Children. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the Doctorate of Philosophy in Arts, Media and Culture at Griffith University, Nathan, Qld.
- ^ Petrie, A. (1998). Gone to an Aunt's: Remembering Canada's Homes for Unwed Mothers.
- ^ Reder, D. (2007). Indian re:ACT(ions) University of British Columbia
- ^ Lyons, T. (2000). "Stolen Nation," in Eye Weekly, January 13, 2000. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.
- ^ Brozinsky, A. (1994). Surrendering an Infant for Adoption: The Birthmother Experience. In The Psychology of Adoption, D. Brozinsky and M. Schechter (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press. (p. 297)
- ^ Chandra, A., Abma, J., Maza, P., & Bachrach, C. (1999). Adoption, adoption seeking, and relinquishment for adoption in the United States. Advance Data (No. 306) from Vital and Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National center for Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad306.pdf
- ^ Parliamentary Paper No. 366, Standing Committee on Social Issues, Report on Adoption Practices, Second Interim Report, Transcripts of Evidence, 16 June 1999 - 25 October 1999
Further reading
- Buterbaugh, K. "Not by Choice," Eclectica, August 2001.
- Buterbaugh, K. "Setting the Record Straight", Moxie Magazine, April 2001.
- Fessler, A. (2006). The Girls Who Went Away; The Hidden History of Women Who Surrendered Children for Adoption in the Decades Before Roe v. Wade. New York: Penguin Press. ISBN 1-59420-094-7
- Kunzel, R. (1995). Fallen Women, Problem Girls: Unmarried Mothers and the Professionalization of Social Work, 1890-1945 (Yale Historical Publications Series) (Paperback). Ann Arbor, MA: Yale University Press (August 30, 1995) ISBN: 0-30006-509-4
- Mandell, B. (2007). "Adoption." New Politics, 11(2), Winter 2007, Whole No. 42.
- Petrie, A. (1998). Gone to an Aunt's: Remembering Canada's Homes for Unwed Mothers. Toronto: * McLelland and Stewart. ISBN 0-7710-6971-5
- Moor, M. (2007). Silent Violence: Australia's White Stolen Children. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the Doctorate of Philosophy in Arts, Media and Culture at Griffith University, Nathan, Qld. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/uploads/approved/adt-QGU20070111.172012/public/02Whole.pdf
- O'Shaughnassy, T. (1994). Adoption, Social Work, and Social Theory. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN: 1-85628-883-8
- Shawyer, J. (1979). Death by Adoption. Cicada Press. ISBN 0-90859-902-1
- Solinger, R. (2000). Wake Up Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race Before Roe v. Wade. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-41592-676-9
- Solinger, R. (2001). Beggars And Choosers: How The Politics Of Choice Shapes Adoption, Abortion And Welfare In The U.S. (Hill and Wang)
Portrayals in Film and Other Media
- Gone To A Good Home (Film Australia 2006). A Film Australia Film Australia was a company established by the Government of Australia to produce films about Australia. Its mission was to create an audio-visual record of Australian life, through the commissioning, distribution and management of programs that deal with matters of national interest or illustrate and interpret aspects of Australian life National Interest Program in association with Big Island Pictures. Produced in association with the Pacific Film and Television Commission and SBS Independent.
- Everlasting: The Girls Who Went Away by Ann Fessler. Described as "a multi-channel, surround-sound audio installation based on oral history interviews Ann Fessler conducted with women who surrendered a baby for adoption in the 1950s and 1960s (as described in the "Calendar," Duke University, retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://calendar.duke.edu/calendar.nsf/EventID/74T9A9)
- The Other Mother: A Moment of Truth Movie (1995) (TV) Director: Bethany Rooney. Writers (WGA): Carol Schaefer (book), Steven Loring.
- The Magdalene Sisters (2002) Director: Peter Mullan, Writer: Peter Mullan Love, War, Adoption (2007) Directed by Suzie Kidnap.
Categories: Adoption history
|
Myrtle Beach Sun News
Don't fret, campers: Myrtle Beach Online has the scoop to help you look smart and convince your friends you've got your act together. ...
and more »
287px x 187px | 10.10kB
[source page]
the United States Baby Scoop Era In the forward to Unlearning Adoption A Guide to Family Preservation and Protection you pin point a moment of clarity you had during a Law elective as a pivotal realization that brought about both this
Marijuana Specialist
Sat, 22 May 2010 20:41:21 GM
LOL, thanks x BSE refers to the . Baby Scoop Era. Not sure, but it may Can someone lend a hand me find law for inquiring for an adopt child? Hi, I am trying to locate laws and punishments for people searching for a birth child back they ...
Q. I have heard the Baby Scoop Era (BSE) described as the time in the 50's, 60's, and 70's when many single, pregnant women were forced by their families to give up their children to adoption. Often they were hidden in their homes or sent to maternity homes. Fathers of some of the adopted children were also victimized by a culture intolert of pre-marital pregnancy - many wanted to marry their children's mothers but they were forbidden to see them. So, I have 2 questions. I have read in some places that the BSE ended in the 70's and others say that the BSE went into the early 80's. Which is it? And why the demise in that decade - why not earlier or later? Thanks for your help. Hi Summy - I have tried to read Ann Fessler's book but sob… [cont.]
Asked by grapesgum - Mon Nov 12 11:47:32 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hi Grapesgum, The "baby scoop era" is a disgraceful dark era in U.S. adoption history, marked by shame, lies, secrecy, inhumane & unethical practices all covered up by totally closed adoptions & sealed records. Young pregnant women, mostly white, middle to upper class, were sent away to maternity homes and given no other choice except to relinquish their babies to adoption. They were not allowed to communicate with the fathers or with anyone else. It was bad for the mothers, it was bad for the children. The babies were snatched away from them at birth often before they were able to even see them. Those who were involved in baby scoop era adoptions are affected in some ways still today. The mid to late 1970's marked the first… [cont.]
Answered by julie j - Mon Nov 12 12:15:24 2007


